MMA Imaging and Calibration Group
Minutes for meeting Tuesday, 25 June 2002 at 4:00pm EDT.
Date: 25 June 2002
Time: 4:00 pm EDT
pm EDT (2:00 pm Socorro, 1:00 pm Tucson)
Phone: (434)296-7082 (CV SoundStation Premier Conference phone 3rd floor).
Past minutes, etc on MMA
Imaging and Calibration Division Page
Agenda
--------
News. -Wootten
News from my point of view.
--------
Configurations - All
Y+: Mark's note on snapshot imaging with the Y+ array.
Sensitivity loss with resolution
Imaging quality of the incremental sub-Y+ arrays.
Please see contribution from Mel Wright.
Discussion: Configuration 3 for northern declinations?
Effect of the ACA
--------
Meetings Past and Future - Wootten
- AMAC Meeting --
- Agenda for ASAC telecon for 3 July. The Charges from the Alma Board are of special interest, here shown with Cox's plan for addressing them.
- Pierre's Proposed ASAC Text:
ASAC Recommendation on the Long Baselines Array geometries
----------------------------------------------------------
At its June 5 2002 teleconf, the ASAC was requested to `summarize the
scientific and technical issues associated with the long baseline
array geometries currently under consideration and to advise the
ACC/ad hoc ALMA Board as to possible cost, land use, and land access
impacts of which it should be aware'.
In the current discussions on the Exclusive Use area on Chajnantor two
options are under consideration regarding the long baseline (14 km)
geometry: the `14-km Ring Configuration' and the `Y+ Configuration'.
The major argument in favor of the Y+ Configuration is that it offers
more continous reconfiguration, providing higher flexibility and less
time lost in non-optimal hybrid configurations, which translates
directly into operational advantages. Other arguments are: shorter
fibers, so better phase stability; better expandability towards even
longer baselines; more flexibility in re-weighting (tapering and/or
uniform) data to adjust angular resolution; possibly less pads,
because no complex hybrid between the 5 km Gaussian and the 14 km
array is needed.
The main argument in favor of the 14-km Ring Configuration is that
this configuration would reach slightly better angular resolution than
the Y+ Configuration. However, this argument is not decisive since a
proper choice of the Y+ Configuration can result in similar angular
resolutions than those obtained with the 14-km Ring Configuration. In
addition, the possibility to expand the Y+ Configuration towards even
longer baselines opens up the possibility to achieve even better
angular resolution in the future. Theoretically, the 14-km Ring
Configuration would provide a slightly better astrometry than the
Y+-Configuration, though further studies have shown that this
improvement would only be marginal under realistic observing
conditions.
Based on the above arguments, the ASAC recommend to abandon the
project of the 14-km Ring Configuration, and to work on optimizing an
Y+ configuration with similar angular resolution.
- You will find below a summary of the point of view of the Japanese
radio community regarding the enhancements to the ALMA baseline
project, which was sent to Pierre Cox by Satoshi Yamamoto. Although, it is
not yet the final plan officially approved by NAOJ, the differences
are likely to be small. In any case, the current summary will be
useful to address the ACC Charge number 4 and discuss the possible
enhancements at the ASAC.
The enhancements which are considered by the Japanese radio
community are as follows:
(1) ACA: Twelve 7-meter antennae and four 12-meter antennae including
cryo systems, baseline-receiver cartridges, IF and backend
systems for them. The four 12-meter antennae are used for
calibrating the ACA and also for accurate single-dish
measurements. This will enhance the imaging capability of ALMA.
(2) New receiver bands: Bands 8, 10 and 4. Receiver cartridges for 64
baseline antennae and 16 ACA antennae. This particularly
enhances the submillimeter-wave capability of ALMA.
(3) Second generation correlator: High resolution correlators for the
64+16 antennae. This enhances the spectroscopic capability of ALMA.
(4) Contribution to infrastructure
It should also be noted that NAOJ is making its best efforts to obtain
a budget to achieve a value very close to the level of 1/3 of a
trilateral ALMA project, so as to cover all the enhancements listed as
(1) - (4). Finally, it is worth mentioning that the production of
antennae of the ACA, i.e. four 12-meter and twelve 7-meter antennae,
together with the enhancement of submillimeter-wave capability are
considered as being strategically important items in the Japanese
budget request.
Ewine has asked IRAM to evaluate the Japanese proposal for four (or is it
more?) total power antennas.
Ewine
also talked with Lee Mundy about strengthening the science case for
the ACA, to help the Japanese defend their proposal. He was still
surprised that the debris disk image did not provide a more convincing
example, to the extent that we even had to leave it out of our science
case. He would like to look into this in more detail in the coming
months. Ewine asked me to get in contact with Lee about the science analysis
of the debris images you and Brian did last year. We need to address this.
- Site assessment/stringency
- Early Science?
- The 3mm Receiver Design review was held earlier in the month.
Documents may
be read at Sitescape. One question
is what the sensitivity should be at the band edges, particularly near the
CO 1-0 line. AW thinks that since in this region the atmosphere is the
limiting factor, poorer receiver performance can be tolerated up to the point
where sensitivity is no longer dominated by the atmosphere. We need to work
this out. Best performance should be in the 90-95 region, where we expect
workhorse use for phase correction. In the extension 84-90 GHz, the ASAC
opined that poorer performance could be tolerated. Ideally, we should know
what the receiver folks might supply. As SG stated in memo 393: There is
significant sensitivity gain in Band 3 between receivers with Trec = 50 K SSB,
and receivers with Trec = 6h*nu/k + 4 K. The later should be kept at least
as a very serious goal for ALMA.
- Change request for Band 7. John Webber checked with Eric
Bryerton about reaching 373 GHz with Band 7.
The LO is not a problem. It is now specified within the
Front End LO group that the LO will reach the nominal band
edges so that mixer designers can test performance beyond
the nominal band--useful for evaluation. Thus, the actual
LO frequency will go to 370 GHz for Band 7.
--------
Calibration--Butler, Mangum
Richer is interested in phase cal discussions pursued in Cambridge.
Issues: Calibration Group Set Up
Because ALMA is going into the construction phase, the current
way we have been handling ALMA science documents requires some
modifications. While in the past we have been exploring a lot
of ideas, ALMA now requires detailed implementation. It becomes
important for the project to be able to distinguish properly
between ideas, working documents, and specifications. It is
currently difficult for an engineer to figure out whether a=20
a particular idea exposed in a document must be implemented or not.
We have been using in the past ALMA Memos and the Project Book
for our purposes. The ALMA project has now installed the=20
"SiteScape" server which is intended to be an archived repository
of all controlled ALMA documents. The Project Book will evolve
towards a more simplified description of the ALMA project.
Because "SiteScape" is a restricted area, and because a more
open approach is required for the Science aspects of ALMA, we propose
a "reviewed memos" approach, which attempts to keep the open spirit
of the Memos series, while implementing some control over the most
important documents. The basic idea is to have "reviewed memos"=20
appearing both in the Memos series and in the SiteScape documentation
system, with a clear "stamp": "Reviewed by the Science IPT".
The 'reviewed memos' process will be as follows:
- 1 - A memo is submitted to the normal ALMA memo series.
- 2 - If it is perceived that the memo is relevant to the=20
issues addressed by our group, and contains material=20
which might affect decisions made by the project in=20
some way, then it will enter into the review process.
The decision will be made by the appropriate group
heads (Bryan Butler for calibration issues, John
Conway for configuration issues, the project scientists
for other issues), in concert with the project
scientists (Stephane Guilloteau and Al Wootten). The
author(s) will be queried as to whether it is=20
acceptable for this memo to be reviewed. An author
may also specifically request that a memo be reviewed,
but this does not guarantee that it will be reviewed.
- 3 - The review process will consist of the following:
- a - Formal reviewers will be asked to review the memo,
these reviewers to be selected by the appropriate
group head and/or project scientists;
- b - Others may review the memo, on their own initiative;
- c - Reviews will be collected by the appropriate group
head and/or project scientists and forwarded to the
author(s); Reviews submitted to the mailing lists are
archived automatically.
- d - The author(s) will prepare a reply to the reviews;
- e - The author(s) will prepare a new version of the memo,
which will then be reviewed by the appropriate group
head and/or the project scientists;
- f - If approved, the memo will be marked as such, and
will be included in the sitescape collection of=20
documents, along with the associated review=20
documentation. Note that the author(s) may also
submit a revised memo to the regular memo series if
desired, and the revised memo may be marked as a
'fully reviewed' memo (wording TBD).
This is a significant departure from the way that we have been
operating in the past, with a much more structured and formal
mechanism for the memos (at least some of them). We note, however,
that the computing division has been using a similar mechanism for
*all* of its memos (with admittedly significantly fewer memos).
Additionally, no author is *forced* to have a memo go through the
new review process, it is rather a choice to be made, in combination
with the appropriate people from the project itself. We feel that
this added structure and formality is necessary, given the point
that we are at in the project, and the fact that we feel that we
can no longer operate in the freewheeling manner that has been
characteristic for us in the past.
Stephane Guilloteau, Science IPT Leader and ALMA Interim Project
Scientist (AIPS)
Al Wootten, Science IPT Deputy Leader and U.S. Project Scientist
Bryan Butler, Calibration Group Head
John Conway, Configuration Group Head
New Memo 422
(for review).
New Memo 423
(for review).
Other
Lucas' list of simulation requirements to be discussed in
Granada
--------
Star Wars -- Others?
Any other reviews of the movie? How about all those exoplanets!!
Exoplanet meeting review.
Monthly reports.
--------
Upcoming Meetings - Wootten
May 2 ASAC agenda.
MAY 6-9 Astrophysics
of Life Space Telescope Science Institute Wootten attending
May 24 ESO Committee of Council
June 2 - 6 AAS Meeting Albuquerque
JUN 18-21 Scientific
Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets at Carnegie Institution
See ALMA abstract. Program now online with two ALMA posters:
Session: Ground-based Planet Search Instruments: ALMA
Jean-Francois Lestrade, Observatoire de Paris/LERMA
"Astrometry at millimeter wavelengths with ALMA to search for extrasolar planets or to determine their orbits"
Henry Alwyn Wootten, National Radio Astronomy Observatory
"Extrasolar Planet Research with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array"
JUN 24 AMAC Meeting Munich
AUG 17/24 URSI General Assembly,
Maastricht, the Netherlands Butler attending
AUG 22/28 SPIE Symposium on Astronomical
Telescopes and Instrumentation, Waikoloa, Hawaii. Brown, Wootten attending
SEP 9-13 Winds, Bubbles
and Explosions
--------
Travel
Oh, always
------