MMA Imaging and Calibration Group

Minutes for meeting Mon, 27 September 1999 at 4pm EDT.

Date: 27 September 1999

Time: 4:00 pm EDT (2:00 pm Socorro, 1:00 pm Tucson)

Phone: (804)296-7082 (CV SoundStation Premier Conference phone).

Past minutes, etc on MMA Imaging and Calibration Division Page

Minutes

--------

Data Rate -

The project book data rate is 1MB/s average, 10MB/s max sustained. This comes from the Scott et. al. memo (#164)</a> which in turn apparently came from a Tucson science meeting (40 antennas). Rupen in a later memo (#194) comes up with a science case for 100's of MB/s (OTF synthesis surveys). In Memo #192, Rupen discussed some science issues which may drive data sampling parameters. Note that the NRAO correlator design is capable of dumping data from the

LTA at a rate of 1GB/s. What is the science-driven rate?

The science requirement which most drives this is:

Wide Field of View

- Mosaicing capability (fast moti

- Total power capability (fast motion)

- Compact array configuration

- Precision amplitude and phase calibration (fast switching)

- Fast correlator dump times -- High data rates

Fast Integration

- Solar observations (bandwidth can be reduced as sensitivity is not an issue

- Pulsar observations (array may be phased)

Since the issue was last considered, the number of antennas has increased to 64(though 50 is a more realistic number) and the diameter has increased to 12m. Since the number of baselines has gone up by a factor of 2.6, the average and peak datarates should be increased by at least this number. An increase in antenna diameter decreases the beamsize and therefore affects the rate at which a large field of view may be imaged. As Rupen points out in Memo No. 192, this rate goes with the square of antenna diameter, and so for the simplest case requires sampling at rate 2.25 times faster for 12m antennas than was required for 8m antennas. The maximum sampling rate is now 1 ms for autocorrelation data, and 16 ms for cross-correlation data. Rupen (192) suggested that dump times of 40 (D/8m)-2 were desirable. The increase in antenna diameter has left the rates within the nominal range.

What are the datarates which these dump times correspond to? Rupen shows that at the fastest rate the antennas can be driven, a rate set by the necessity to be able to suppress atmospheric fluctuations, the integration times may be as short as one millisec for a 12m antenna at the highest range of operating frequency, 850 Ghz. This results in a datarate of 1000*256 spectral channels*4bytes per datum*64 antennas or perhaps 65 MB per second, about twice times the project book standard scaled to 64 antennas. One could choose to cut this by compromising e.g. the number of channels, the degree of atmospheric cancellation (perhaps by observing only in the best weather), or by observing with a subarray (in the case where this might provide the requisite sensitivity).

The conclusion was reached by the discussion group that the datarates should be modified upward to:

30 Mbytes/s Maximum sustained data rate

3 Mbytes/s Average raw data rate

Barry Clark opined that today one could get off-the-shelf hardware which could accomplish 10 Mbytes/s; while 30 Mbytes/s was probably the maximum achievable.

--------

Configurations - Min

Comments on MMA Memo No. 274.

--------

MAC Meeting - Wootten

So here is a possible agenda for the 9 October meeting.

***************************************************************************

ALMA Science Advisory Committee

9 October 1999

Agenda

Omni Shoreham Hotel meeting room reserved, setup in school room style.

Provisional estimate: 70 attendees, maximum.

'Freshly brewed coffee, tea, hot chocolate' $47 per gallon

'Mineral water' $6 per liter

'Muffins' Blueberry, Orange cranberry, , Banana $30 per dozen

0900 Committee Caucus

Overview of the Project at Midcourse -- R. Brown

Antenna Procurement Contract -- P. Napier, Anderson(?)

1030 Coffee 'Freshly brewed coffee, tea, hot chocolate' $47 per gallon

Other Technical Reports

Report on LO PDR? -- as appropriate

ALMA Frequency Bands -- Wootten, Guilloteau

Long baselines -- Wootten, Guilloteau

Science updated -- Wootten, Guilloteau

1200 Lunch (hotel charges begin at $25 per person; perhaps eat out?)

Blueprint for the Joint ALMA Project D&D Phase -- R. Kurz, R. Brown

Definition and Formation of Joint ALMA Science Advisory Committee

-- Wootten, Churchwell,

Guilloteau, Menten

Committee Caucus -- New SAC

1530 Coffee

***************************************************************************

Stephane proposed a similar set of goals:

" US-Europe Meeting goals

- Setup a proposal for the joint ALMA SAC (format, suggested names perhaps in a restricted session)

- Discuss timeline differences between Europe and US

- Discuss the 35 GHz band issue

- Discuss the longest baseline issue

- Present and discuss the draft Work Plan which we must have prepared for that date (I'll send you soon a preliminary draft)

- Discuss our position vis-a-vis the Japanese proposals

- Any items you wish

- Any other business

Since most of the scientific topics will have been covered before, I believe we should stick to practical problems."

--------

--------

ALMA Science Meeting

I will update everyone on the status of this event.

Registered: 178 (-2 cancellations)

Paid: 132

Banquet: 122

Posters: 59 abstracts received; 72 including intendees.

I've created a posterbook for the meeting. Some pages are not in this version-- participants and paper numbers, for instance.

Kate has posted these to the WWW. I will order posterboards enough for 72 posters.

--------

PR -- Wootten

Geoff Blake wrote: Lee Mundy has made a nice image of what ALMA might see in a YSO accretion disk. I think it is quite pretty, and there are lots of features in the image: 1) A central hole 3 AU in radius. 2) A roughly 2AU wide cleared ring centered 7 AU with soft edges -- Lee used a Gaussian in absorption. 3) A protoplanet overdensity at 9 AU with a Gaussian FWHM of 2 AU and a factor of 9 overdensity. The wings are created by a second Gaussian component which is elongated along the orbital path. 4) A protoplanet overdensity at 22 AU with a Gaussian FMWH of 1.5 AU and a factor of 6 overdensity 5) A protoplanet overdensity at 37 AU with a Gaussian FWHM of 3 AU and a factor of 4 overdensity 6) The word ALMA written in the lower part of the disk with an overdensity of a factor of 2 on the underlying disk The leters are 12 pixels wide and 100 pixels high -- that is roughly 4 AU by 35 AU. 7) The word ALMA written in the upper part of the disk with an underdensity of 20 percent. Each of the protoplanets also has an underdensity of 10 percent in a ring at the same orbital radius. The ALMA letters are in there as a gauge of image fidelity. In the ALMA simulated observations, the beam for 10 km baselines at 230 GHz is around 20 milli-arcseconds which is 2.8 AU at Taurus (the pixel size in the model is about 0.35 AU). There is no phase noise in the simulated image, but there is gaussian noise at the level appropriate for the stated ALMA sensitivities. The image really drives home what ALMA can do in planet forming environments. I think we are also going to try and add an envelope to this for very deeply embedded systems, and Michiel Hogerheijde is going to run a 2D Monte Carlo simulation for spectral line work.
I spoke with Lee about what went into this. He randomly placed 50 antennas on a 10km ring and let the array observe the source on the right for 6 hours. This array does not sample the uv plane too well, he found. He added data from a 3km array, with 50 randomly placed antennas spaced greater than 100 nanosec or so. This gave the needed short spacings. We plan on using this image in the display for the ALMA meeting. Lee can prvide the FITS file if needed.

--------

WBS merging

--------

Total Power Mapping --'Holdaway Holdover' Memo - Butler

------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------

Action Items 27 September 99

DECISION: Configurations--where are we?

DECISION: Is a nutating secondary necessary?

DECISION: What is the effect of 1/f noise in the HEMT amplifiers of SIS receivers upon our ability to combine total power and interferometric images into a faithful representation of the sky?

MEETINGS: MAC meeting 9 October 1999 at 9am, face to face at the Omni, D. C. Next ImCal meeting 4 October 1999. ------

--------

Travel

If your travel isn't on here you have not sent me a travel authorization.

------

A. Wootten: 5-9 October, DC

J. Mangum:

M. Yun:

B. Butler:

S. Radford: