ANASAC Telecon 27 June 2003. Attending: Wootten, Glenn, Blain, Crutcher, Mundy, Myers, Carilli Wootten announced news from the AUI Board meeting--RG will retire 1 Oct 2004; a search for the next AUI President commences immediately Chairman Crutcher called for acceptance of the minutes of the last meeting. Minutes accepted. Wootten gave a summary of ALMA Project News, including passage by the Chilean Senate of the permissions for ESO to operate the Observatory in Chile. Construction on the site is expected to follow shortly. France has changed its 'ad referendum' vote on the ALMA Bilateral Agreement to approval. A short summary of upcoming dates, as listed in the agenda, was given. Wootten then gave a short summary of calibration presentations at ALMA Week. Glendenning next gave a report on ALMA Computing Many software changes occurred after the aips++ technical review identified needs to concentrate on strategic issues. The aips++ consortium disbanded as part of this effort to focus. Cornwell resigned so aips++ management now directly under Glendenning and Ulvestad. This shortens the management line, improving efficiency. Now aips++ is a direct part of the ALMA Computing IPT line essentially. The project views this positively as the ALMA-aips++ connection is now much more direct. Glenn asked how many full time equivalent people working on aips++? Glendenning replied that this was on the order of seven at NRAO. There will in addition be two positions (one presently filled) in Canada. Others (e.g. in Australia) will continue to work on aips++ but these developers will not necessarily work toward ALMA goals. One important ALMA milestone is a year from now, basically pass/fail. Focus is established on this milestone now, and on meeting the benchmark which must be met for that. This is Critical Design Review II. aips++ is a direct part of the Computing IPT and we want to make sure it meets the milestones. Myers asked: "How big is ALMA Computing?" Glendenning reolied that budgeted is currently 35 FTEs plus in kind contributions (e.g. aips++) for a total up to about 50. Next the discussion turned to the next item on the agenda, dates for a face-to-face discussion. Although no date was satisfactory to all ANASAC members, the majority could meet on 25 August. By far the majority agreed that a meeting at an easy-to-reach place was the best for a one day meeting, and the Chicago O'Hare airport will be the site of the meeting. Some members will be unable to attend; a telecon or videocon may accommodate those members The discussion turned to the proposed agenda. Some thought that the statements of interest from members could be too lengthy on the program. The focus should be on operations. A question was asked whether there is a specific charge to the committee; Mundy noted that the ALMA Board was expected to address charges to the ASAC soon; advice would be sought from the ANASAC by the NA members of the ASAC as part of the development of a response to the Board charges. The main focus of the ANASAC should remain on North American operations. Crutcher said that he would seek more detailed input from Director Lo on exactly what he wanted from this committee.