ANASAC Telecon 23 May 2003 Present: Dan, Jean, Chris, Phil, Al, Leo, Mark, Dick, Min, Fan, Dave Sanders, Darrel Emerson 1. Dick Crutcher has been elected Chair of the ANASAC for one year. 2. Face-to-Face meeting. The suggested date of 2003-June-16 conflicted with travel plans for certain key committee members. New Business -- Agenda 1. ALMA Project News. Wootten summarized some items relating to the ALMA Project. 2. ANASAC Face to face meeting (Crutcher, Wootten) Discussion on the purpose of this meeting ensued. Wootten stated that major purposes would be to discuss the form of the US ALMA Science Center, the discussion for the AAS town meeting, and the science meeting next year. Roles of the RSC were discussed. Astronomers could go to the Center, with support, to massage their data. It could act as a mechanism to incorporate Americans into the ALMA verification and commissioning phases. LB stated that the STScI provided a good model for an ALMA RSC. We should think about ways that we have interacted with it and what we would like to change. The actual ALMA site is not unlike the HST ops center, which may not be at the STScI, while the latter is an independent academic unit with an interest in interaction with local universities. Although expensive, the scale of operations at the ALMA RSC may not be so great. NRAO would like Jansky Fellowships to be more similar to Hubble fellowships. Emerson stated that an Operations Group had begun meeting to discuss just these items with regard to the overall ALMA project. The discussion sounds very much like the discussion we are having now--this group has about ten people on it. Radford, Janes, Kingsley, Emerson. Sramek. Two meetings have occurred so far. Crutcher noted that the ANASAC is nearly all potential ALMA users, and as such would have a different slant. Emerson noted that his group will not hesitate to make scientific comments. Discussion moved to the time for the meeting, with interest centering on the end of August. ACTION Wootten to send around possible dates. One possibility is around the time of the ASAC meeting, 4-5 September. 3. ALMA/AAS - Town Meeting January 2004? (Crutcher, Wootten) Topical Session Jan 2005? Wootten noted that we have officially requested a town meeting for the next AAS. Some presentations on the state of ALMA and audience participation are expected. This committee should be involved and seek input, perhaps along the lines of the questionnaire circulated by ESO at the meeting in Garching last November. 4. Science Workshop 2004 (Wootten) An ALMA Science Workshop will be held in Charlottesville, along the lines of one held in Europe last Fall (ESO Workshop: Science Operations with ALMA, ESO, Garching 8 Nov 2002; see also Survey from November ESO Meeting). Probably a single day is not long enough so that people attending can begin to network. AAS meetings are good places to recruit enthusiasm, but this also depends on how well we advertise it to the community. It depends upon capturing people's interest. Certainly should do an AAS meeting. But a separate meeting for those of us more interested in the meeting would be good. especially if it is to have a focus for the RSC. ALMA is still quite far away for the average person attending the AAS. We'd get dropins there but not likely would they travel to a special meeting for a far off. 5. Operations Plan Discussion/Role of Regional Support Centers (Wootten) Wootten led a short introduction to Chapter 6 of the Project Plan, containing the description of ALMA operations. In other business, it was noted that the aips++ consortium jointly disbanded. It was suggested that we ask Brian Glendenning to join next month. Ask him what plans for user software and pipeline processing are, whether they involve what currently is called aips++. Also his views on RSCs. DE sent out link to ops group page. People should look at initial documents from Stephane Guilloteau with a comprehensive list of issues pertaining to science. Next Meeting: 20 June was discussed at the same time. However, owing to a conflict, the date of 27 June was substituted.