Next: OTF Mapping
Up: Total Power Observing with
Previous: Introduction
There are five schemes that are usually considered for this purpose. The
simplest is the on/off pointing method. Here one points at the source for a
short integration, perhaps 10-30 seconds, and then at blank sky for the same
time,
and then takes the difference. The rest of the map results from a sequence of
such measurements. For spectral line observations with narrow
band widths, the receiver noise is usually large enough that it dominates both
the atmospheric brightness fluctuations and the noise due to receiver gain
fluctuations in this method, and it works. The second scheme is to use
rapid frequency switching for spectral line observing, and this also works.
Neither of these procedures will work for continuum measurements. That's
obvious for the second method. For the first, the wider bandwidth means that
the receiver noise is lower than that due to either the atmospheric brightness
fluctuations or the effects of receiver gain fluctuations.
For continuum total power observations, there are three schemes that can
be used. The most common method is to employ a nodding secondary
mirror. A related alternative is the focal plane chopper. The third idea is
On-The-Fly mapping (Emerson, Klein, and Haslam, 1979, A&A, 76, 92). In all
three cases, differential ground spillover will be a problem and will probably
set the fundamental limit to the accuracy and depth of the continuum single
antenna maps.
The nodding secondary, giving a rapid comparison, avoids gain drifts.
Its main weakness is that it is difficult to get a throw of more than a few
arc minutes. While this will be adequate for some science programs,
there are situations where one needs to chop to an ``off" position
that is 10-20 (or more) minutes away. This is especially the case at the
shorter wavelengths where, in the Milky Way, the background dust emission is
bright.
The focal plane chopper, on the other hand, can only
throw large angles, typically 10 minutes or more. Other disadvantages for our
application are that it is often difficult to have a good balance between
the ``on" and ``off" and the mechanism would probably have to be mounted
on each receiver separately, which could be an annoying complication for
the ALMA antennas with their many receivers.
The On-The-Fly (OTF) method looks to be the most flexible and simplest,
and we summarize its properties and requirements below. Whatever scheme is
chosen, the maximum throw will limit the maximum spatial scales in the
resulting maps.
Next: OTF Mapping
Up: Total Power Observing with
Previous: Introduction
Al Wootten
2000-04-04