================================================================== ALMA Science Advisory Committee Teleconference, 12 June 2000 Draft Minutes Participants: Bachiller, Booth, Bronfman, Brown, Cox, Crutcher, Emerson, Fukui, Guilloteau, Hasegawa, Ishiguru, Menten, Nakai, Richer, Shaver, Walmsley, Wilson, Wootten, Yun The draft agenda was accepted as proposed. 1. Date of next face to face meeting in Berkeley The tentative date for this meeting is 9/10 September. 2. ALG and Priorities The recent e-mail from Japan (Y. Fukui via N. Nakai, 12 June) and related comments in the e-mail from S. Guilloteau was discussed. a) Antennas. There was a discussion of the size and number of small antennas, whether it was required to cross-correlate the small and large antennas, and whether all receiver bands should be included in the small antennas. It was agreed that simulations are needed, and K. Menten asked the Project Scientists to contact the appropriate persons to carry out these studies. b) Receivers. Japan proposed that it provide bands 8 and 10. However, in the ASAC a strong interest in the 2 mm band (number 4) was expressed, especially for high-redshift objects. The importance of band 1 was also reiterated. A concern was expressed as to whether band 10 was technologically feasible yet. c) Correlator. Japan has reiterated its interest in a large correlator. It was not clear whether this would include the cost of the associated computer system. The value of adding this extra correlator power was questioned, as there is a trade-off between observing time and bandwidth. It was suggested that there be discussion between the Japanese and US/Europe correlator groups. K. Menten stressed that this was just a first discussion, and iteration is required, involving both the Project Scientists and the ASAC. C. Wilson reminded the ASAC that R. Brown wanted input by 23 June, in time for the next ALG meeting. K. Menten said that he will work on this with S. Guilloteau and A. Wootten, and distribute a draft to the ASAC by Monday 19th. 3. Science Software Requirements The document from the ALMA Science Software Requirements Committee, prepared by R. Lucas, was discussed. Strong support was expressed for dynamic scheduling as the default mode, especially for submm observations, although S. Guilloteau commented that there were also advantages in the astronomers coming to the telescope. Concerning the data products (point 2), it was agreed that the pipeline should provide the products up to and including 2(d) as recommended by the SSR committee, but (e) and (f) were considered very ambitious and undecided. Concerning the database, it was felt that only the science data should have a proprietary period. K. Menten said he will write a first draft of possible answers to all of these issues, to be distributed to the ASAC for iteration. 4. Upcoming reviews D. Emerson said that the report on the Test Interferometer meeting held in May will be available shortly. It was announced that the antenna PDRs will take place on June 20-23. 5. Change of hours for ASAC telecons It was agreed to change the hours for the ASAC telecons for the next few meetings to: 14:15 UT (= 16:15 CEST = 10:15 EDT = 07:15 PDT = 23:15 Japan) Thus, the next telecon is scheduled for Monday 10th July at 14:15 UT. ===================================================================