Next: Comparisons with other telescopes
Up: Rationale for Band 1
Previous: Cost
The point source sensitivity of the Band 1 would exceed that
of the UPGRADED VLA! There is less total collecting area, but the
higher aperture efficiency (>2 x ) more than makes up for it. The much
better site and cleaner optics helps further.
The field of view of ALMA is 25/12 times larger than the VLA.
For a given point source sensitivity the surveying speed of ALMA will
be more than 20 times faster than the upgraded VLA. Interesting in its
own right and very important for galaxy surveys, CMB foreground
experiments, dust surveys, etc.
ALMA sensitivity will be superb and unparalleled for arcminute scales at
Band 1. A simple estimate including ONLY baselines from nearest
neighbor telescopes gives 2
K in one hour and an arcminute beam.
There are 2.5 x 64 nearest neighbors in a close pack configuration.
Of course, for imaging it is much better to include all baselines -
see simulations. The bottom line is that it is fantastic.
IMPORTANT NOTE: ALMA does not replace the VLA! The VLA has much higher
resolution. Together they cover both the N and S hemispheres. The VLA
will excell for detailed studies of compact objects (AGN, stellar
accretion disks, etc. ALMA will find which objects are
worthy of higher resolution studies (eg., survey star forming
regions for disks, galaxies, etc.).
Next: Comparisons with other telescopes
Up: Rationale for Band 1
Previous: Cost
Al Wootten
2000-04-04