next up previous
Next: Early References to Mergers Up: A History of Mergers Previous: A History of Mergers

The Hubble Sequence

In 1920, a Great Debate raged between Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis; what was the scale of the Universe?. Considering the ``spiral nebulae", what we now know to be external galaxies, Shapley argued that these were merely nearby gas clouds in a Universe that existed wholly within our own Galaxy. Curtis disagreed; he expounded the view that the Sun was but a member of a small Galaxy of which there were many.
The true nature of our Galaxy and the Universe was resolved by Edwin Hubble. Using the 100 m Hooker telescope he was able to gauge the distance to Cepheids in M31, the Andromeda Galaxy; this distance was greater than that proposed by Shapley for the dimensions of our Galaxy and thus M31 must lie beyond its boundaries, a galaxy in its own right.
Hubble is perhaps better known for his observations which demonstrated that the Universe is expanding (borne out in the by now infamous Hubble Law), but he was also responsible for another important development of extragalactic astronomy - the Hubble Sequence. It should not be surprising that Hubble spent many years surveying thousands of galaxies, and during the course of his work, he noticed a trend - galaxies could be ordered into a sequence based on their morphology, the so called Hubble Sequence.
On the left hand side of the sequence, which is commonly called a Tuning Fork diagram, we have the ellipticals which range from E0 up to E7 based on their ellipticity. E0s are spherical and ball like while an E7 is shaped like a rugby ball. At the vertex we have the S0s, lenticulars - galaxies which have disks like spirals but unlike spirals are bulge dominated. Then we branch out into the spirals, Sa, Sb and Sc and the barred spirals, SBa, SBb and SBc.
The obvious question to ask is why the dichotomy of shapes among bulge dominated versus disk dominated galaxies? This was a problem of nature versus nurture - initial guidance was sought in the formation of galaxies, and indeed, the ELS (Eggen, Lynden-Bell, Sandage) hypothesis seemed to offer a solution. Stars in ellipticals formed far earlier and more quickly during the initial collapse of a primordial gas cloud than their counterparts in spirals. However, this now introduced the question, why should this be so? It is at this point that the importance of galaxy mergers becomes clear.


next up previous
Next: Early References to Mergers Up: A History of Mergers Previous: A History of Mergers

Chris Power
Thu Sep 16 20:11:54 BST 1999