MMA Imaging and Calibration Group
Minutes for meeting Tuesday, 6 Aug 2002 at 12:00pm EDT.
Date: 6 Aug 2002
Time: 4:00 pm EDT
(2:00 pm Socorro, 1:00 pm Tucson)
Phone: (434)296-7082 (CV SoundStation Premier Conference phone 3rd floor).
Past minutes, etc on MMA
Imaging and Calibration Division Page
Agenda
--------
News. -Wootten
News from my point of view.
The VertexRSI antenna continues to rise.
- It is with deep regret that I announce that Mr. Guillermo Delgado passed
away on Friday, 26 July 2002.
As ALMA engineer and scientist he was responsible for important parts of
the ALMA site characterization. Mr. Delgado has contributed
significantly to the ALMA site development, such as ALMA radio frequency
interference protection and ALMA communication studies. We were all
impressed by his enthusiasm and commitment and are grateful for his work
at ESO.
I am sure you feel as deeply affected as I, and that you will join me in
expressing our deep sorrow for his family's loss.
Catherine Cesarsky
- JAO News - Telecon 1 Aug
Configuration Final Review -- Grenoble 30 Sept - 1 Oct 2002.
Budgets 2003 and beyond due 15 August
ALMA Site Infrastructure Requirements Review 2002 October 22-24 NRAO Tucson
ALMA Antenna Transporter Requirements Review 2002 October 22-24 NRAO Tucson
- ACC News - Telecon 1 Aug
EIS submitted 24 July, begin 120 day period
Meetings in Santiago
Meeting in Antafagasta
--------
Configurations - All
Mark has prepared Y+
material.
--------
Meetings Past and Future - Wootten
- ASAC Telecon tomorrow--Agenda
- Agenda for ASAC Face-to-face. The Charges from the Alma Board are of special interest, here shown with Cox's plan for addressing them. There was an
Early Science telecon today to discuss Stephane's draft points.
Early Science Sensitivity Comparisons
CARMA Sensitivity Comparisons
Mark says of the site phase stability:
I have munged the actual data (for the first two years at Chajnantor,
which was an easy to get data set that I use quite often), and
the cumulative distributions of the various phase stabilities
can be found on
my home page
There is a mighty misconception among almost everyone (which leads me to
believe that very few people actually read the literature -- hell, I
don't!): while opacity shows a dramatic improvement with site elevation,
the phase stability improves much more weakly with site elevation.
Chajnantor is a great site, but it is far from perfect, and adding
the submillimeter bands, which has the effect of snatching up
the best phase stability conditions, is pinching is even harder
at the other bands.
Note that tau(225) > 0.2 about 12.3% of the time.
- Other Misconceptions
I don't read Spanish too well, but it seems to me that this article
which Peter
Gray noted to me attributes ALMA to ESO, a serious misconception!
ALMA Antafagasta
- Phase Stability Requirements for Cross Band Observations (ie, Fast Switching)
from Mark.
- Although I wasn't completely sure whether 'IPT Lead'=='Project Scientist'
I don't think it would work very well if there were a Science IPT Lead who
was different from the Project Scientist. Insofar as getting jobs done,
I think it works best if PS just keeps us from tripping over each other,
doing the same tasks, and gives overall guidance as to what needs to be done
next. The NA science group meets every week in telecon, with an agenda
(minutes on paper only!) kept at http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~awootten/mmaimcal/
as you probably are already aware. If you would like to be on the NA
Science exploder, still anachronistically named mmaimcal, let me know
and I'll include you (you can turn mailings on or off, only see digests,
or just look at archives if you join). Maybe a few words on plans with
15 August in mind:
In my mind, that is finishing the configuration ASAP and getting on
with calibration, as the telescope on which to test our calibration schemes
begins to tower over the desert. Toward this end, Mark will work on
total power modeling, finishing his famous unfinished memo on the subject,
and Bryan and Steve Myers will guide the calibration group. Steve is working
on carrying out benchmarking of AIPS++ using simulated ALMA data right now.
Since both of them are at the AOC, they will also help with testing at the
ATF. I think that goals should include testing nutation vs. fast switching;
amplitude calibration techniques (including, I hope, a secondary calibration
system and a semitransparent vane; one on each of the antennas)
but not until the antenna evaluation is finished. I would like to see
prototype interferometry as soon as practicable after evaluation finishes, in
early 2004. I have seen no schedule for the prototype interferometer, nor
have I seen the most approximate of milestones for it, and I think this is
something the project must quickly and seriously address.
Mark described a plan in which the secondary calibration system is scrapped.
I think this is premature. There is a working prototype, and work is being
done on addressing issues Stephane has raised. Some of this will appear in the
review of his memo, other material in a memo on further testing. In the
best of all possible worlds, ALMA would assign someone to Hat Creek to carry
this through to a decision point in 2003. I will propose hiring that person.
The problem is that the system is on a specific antenna needed by the array,
which is therefore seldom available. The hiree would work to implement an
ALMA-appropriate model on the Vertex antenna, should BIMA tests favor further
construction of the instrument. I hope that a similar activity will occur in
Europe on the semitransparent vane. I had hoped for some GBT-related
development of the vane but they have discarded that mechanism as impractical
(no people to measure scattering properties of the absorber, etc, etc.).
The WVR effort is European, but there are working prototypes at the SMA and
soon on the VLA, and at OVRO, the latter two at 22 GHz. None produces
the calibration correction we need for ALMA. Butler works half time on ALMA
and half time on the EVLA, which includes the WVR system. I don't propose
money or manpower go into the WVR effort on the NA side, but that we remain
close to its progress. IRMA may be deployed at Chajnantor sometime, an NA
system. Again, little in the way of money or manpower is devoted to IRMA,
but we remain in close touch with its development.
Site:
Radford will provide details on this. Fundamentally, data should
be collected in support of the ALMA Board request of the ASAC.
Milestones:
1 October 2002: Configuration approved. After this, reconnaissance of the
longer baseline locations, with a delta final review after that is accomplished.
Q2 2003 (1 April?): begin total power tests with evaluated prototype.
1 May 2004: Prototype interferometer calibration tests? Having seen no
milestones, perhaps we can manufacture some.
1 May 2005: Prototype Band 6 receiver on prototype interferometer? This would
press the schedule I noted on a blackboard at the CDL (Having seem no
milestones on paper...)
************************************************************************
Ewine's focus:
--------------
1. Coordination of European mm astronomers + plans for Euro-RSC, in
connection with (but not limited to) EU call for proposals for
funding. I'll be working together with Pierre, Peter Shaver and John
Richer.
2. Phase I-> phase II transition in Europe: working together with Dick Kurz
+ ALMA-E project office on review of European phase I work, procedure
for call for phase II proposals and evaluation of those proposals from
science perspective
3. Operations plan: any issues as requested by JAO such as early
science operations.
These three items will likely take all my available time.
--------
Calibration--Butler, Mangum
Reviewers appointed for memos.
Here is the list of memos and targeted reviewers, going backward in
time, along with the list of targeted reviewers:
1 - Memo 423 - The Vane Calibration System revisited
Guilloteau, 2002May27 (draft)
Targeted reviewers: Steve Myers, Matt Carter, Geoff Blake
(this draft memo may be obtained at:
http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~awootten/mmaimcal/alma_423.pdf ).
2 - Memo 422 - The Dual-Load Calibration device revisited
Guilloteau, 2002May23
Targeted reviewers: Douglas Bock, Lee Mundy, Jeff Mangum
3 - Memo 427 - Antenna Position Calibration
Wright, 2002May16
Targeted reviewers: Robert Lucas, Ed Fomalont, Craig Walker
4 - Memo 372 - An Amplitude Calibration Strategy for ALMA
Guilloteau, 2002May10
Targeted reviewers: Jeff Mangum, Larry D'Addario, Mark Gurwell
5 - Memo 415 - Phase Correction using Submillimeter Atmospheric Continuum Emissi
on
Matsushita et. al, 2002Apr04
Targeted reviewers: Jose Cernicharo, Mark Holdaway, John Richer
6 - Memo 404 - Atmospheric Dispersion and Fast Switching Phase Calibration
Holdaway & Pardo, 2001Dec19
and
7 - Memo 403 - Fast Switching Phase Correction Revisited for 64 12 m Antennas
Holdaway, 2001Dec17
Targeted reviewers: Mel Wright, Dave Woody, John Richer
8 - Memo 402 - Illumination Taper Misalignment and Its Calibration
Holdaway, 2001Dec12
Targeted reviewers: Richard Hills, Peter Napier
9 - Memo 352 - Design and Development of 183 GHz Water Vapour Radiometers
Hills et al., 2001Mar
Targeted reviewers: Dave Woody, Chris Wilson, Dick Plambeck
--------
Other
Monthly report for Jun-Jul is now due!
NSF News...
The Committee is providing $1,056,570,000 for the mathematical and physical sciences. The Committee has increased the fiscal year 2003 request for the physics, chemistry, astronomy,
materials research and multidisciplinary research subactivities by a total of $135,000,000. The Committee remains concerned that support for the physical sciences has not kept pace
with the growth in other disciplines. Yet it is the sustained investment in these disciplines that has enabled the development of today's advanced weapon systems, state-of-the-art
medical diagnostic equipment, and improved communications systems. The Committee's recommendation will strengthen the core research and instrumentation programs in these
subactivities as well as adequately support the national astronomy centers in West Virginia, New Mexico, and elsewhere, and other NSF physical science facilities. The Committee also
directs NSF to provide adequate support for preparatory work for the Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope (GSMT). The GSMT was one of the highest priorities recommended in the
National Academy of Sciences Astronomy and Astrophysics Committee's decadal survey.
...
From the additional funds provided for the mathematical and physical sciences directorate, the Committee is adjusting the request by providing an additional $7,300,000 for the national
radio astronomy observatories, $4,200,000 for the national optical astronomy observatories, and $14,500,000 for the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility, the National High Magnetic
Field Laboratory, the Wisconsin Synchrotron Radiation Center, and other facilities. The Committee's recommendation also includes the $4,000,000 requested for the continuation of the
Telescope System Instrumentation Program which was initiated by the Committee in fiscal year 2002.
...
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $79,280,000 for major research equipment and facilities construction. Support for the terascale computing systems has been provided in the Research and
Related Activities Appropriations Account. Within this account, the Committee's recommendation includes funding for the following projects:
$20,000,000 for Earthscope; $30,000,000 for the Atacama Large Millimeter Array telescope; $9,720,000 for the Large Hadron Collider; $13,560,000 for the Network for Earthquake
Engineering Simulation; and $6,000,000 for South Pole Station.
The Committee remains concerned about the Foundation's management of large scale construction projects and the priority setting process used to select projects to be funded. ...
SMA News...
Last week's announcement of our first fringes at 682 GHz was qualified
by the phrase "these are probably the first interferometric measurements
ever made in this band." Indeed, Christine Wilson faxed a copy of a
spectrum of the recombination line in MWC349 at 450 microns obtained
with the CSO-JCMT interferometer on OCT 20, 1998.
The fully executed sublease and non-exclusive easement agreement for
the site of the Hilo facility has been received from the University of
Hawaii. This document is needed before a construction contract can
be let.
--------
Upcoming Meetings - Wootten
AUG 17/24 URSI General Assembly,
Maastricht, the Netherlands Butler attending
AUG 22/28 SPIE Symposium on Astronomical
Telescopes and Instrumentation, Waikoloa, Hawaii. Brown, Wootten attending;
Text of ALMA article.
SEP 9-13 Winds, Bubbles
and Explosions
JAN 5/9, 2003 201st Meeting of the American Astronomical Society
JUL 13-26, 2003 Twenty-Fifth General Assembly of the IAU
JUL 22/25, 2003 IAU Symposium (221): Star Formation at High Angular Resolution, Sydney, Australia. Tyler
Bourke is a co-chair of the scientific
organizing committee. Good opportunity to show ALMA capabilities.
SEP 22-26, 2003 4th Cologne-Bonn-Zermatt-Symposium on The Dense Interstellar Medium in Galaxies
--------
Travel
Oh, always
------